Review



arccheck helical diode array sun nuclear  (Sun Nuclear Corporation)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Sun Nuclear Corporation arccheck helical diode array sun nuclear
    Device measurement averages taken across all six patient plans. The measurement used for the reproducibility analysis is given in parentheses (percent of pixels passing gamma for the planar devices, the nC charge reading for the cc04 ion chamber, and the dose (cGy) measured for the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The averages reported are for both the “redelivery” and “total delivery” measurements (three measurements each), which over the six patients translates to averages taken over 18 measurements each for “redelivery” and “total delivery”
    Arccheck Helical Diode Array Sun Nuclear, supplied by Sun Nuclear Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/arccheck+helical+diode+array+sun+nuclear/pmc04048867-48-33-37?v=Sun+Nuclear+Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    arccheck helical diode array sun nuclear - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Reproducibility in patient‐specific IMRT QA"

    Article Title: Reproducibility in patient‐specific IMRT QA

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4741

    Device measurement averages taken across all six patient plans. The measurement used for the reproducibility analysis is given in parentheses (percent of pixels passing gamma for the planar devices, the nC charge reading for the cc04 ion chamber, and the dose (cGy) measured for the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The averages reported are for both the “redelivery” and “total delivery” measurements (three measurements each), which over the six patients translates to averages taken over 18 measurements each for “redelivery” and “total delivery”
    Figure Legend Snippet: Device measurement averages taken across all six patient plans. The measurement used for the reproducibility analysis is given in parentheses (percent of pixels passing gamma for the planar devices, the nC charge reading for the cc04 ion chamber, and the dose (cGy) measured for the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The averages reported are for both the “redelivery” and “total delivery” measurements (three measurements each), which over the six patients translates to averages taken over 18 measurements each for “redelivery” and “total delivery”

    Techniques Used:

    Venn diagram showing statistically significant grouping of dosimetric systems based on their “total delivery” reproducibility. The coefficient of variation is given in parentheses. The coefficient of variation of film was significantly different from the cc04 ion chamber, MapCHECK with AP beams formed into a composite plane, MapCHECK with AP beams analyzed in a field‐by‐field analysis, and the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The coefficient of variation of the ArcCHECK and the MapCHECK with the original rotational gantry angles were not significantly different from either group.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Venn diagram showing statistically significant grouping of dosimetric systems based on their “total delivery” reproducibility. The coefficient of variation is given in parentheses. The coefficient of variation of film was significantly different from the cc04 ion chamber, MapCHECK with AP beams formed into a composite plane, MapCHECK with AP beams analyzed in a field‐by‐field analysis, and the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The coefficient of variation of the ArcCHECK and the MapCHECK with the original rotational gantry angles were not significantly different from either group.

    Techniques Used:

    Isolating the error caused by setup alone from the redelivery and total coefficients of variation (CV) averaged across all patient plans
    Figure Legend Snippet: Isolating the error caused by setup alone from the redelivery and total coefficients of variation (CV) averaged across all patient plans

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    arccheck helical diode array sun nuclear  (Sun Nuclear Corporation)
    90
    Sun Nuclear Corporation arccheck helical diode array sun nuclear
    Device measurement averages taken across all six patient plans. The measurement used for the reproducibility analysis is given in parentheses (percent of pixels passing gamma for the planar devices, the nC charge reading for the cc04 ion chamber, and the dose (cGy) measured for the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The averages reported are for both the “redelivery” and “total delivery” measurements (three measurements each), which over the six patients translates to averages taken over 18 measurements each for “redelivery” and “total delivery”
    Arccheck Helical Diode Array Sun Nuclear, supplied by Sun Nuclear Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/arccheck+helical+diode+array+sun+nuclear/pmc04048867-48-33-37?v=Sun+Nuclear+Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    arccheck helical diode array sun nuclear - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Device measurement averages taken across all six patient plans. The measurement used for the reproducibility analysis is given in parentheses (percent of pixels passing gamma for the planar devices, the nC charge reading for the cc04 ion chamber, and the dose (cGy) measured for the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The averages reported are for both the “redelivery” and “total delivery” measurements (three measurements each), which over the six patients translates to averages taken over 18 measurements each for “redelivery” and “total delivery”

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Reproducibility in patient‐specific IMRT QA

    doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4741

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Device measurement averages taken across all six patient plans. The measurement used for the reproducibility analysis is given in parentheses (percent of pixels passing gamma for the planar devices, the nC charge reading for the cc04 ion chamber, and the dose (cGy) measured for the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The averages reported are for both the “redelivery” and “total delivery” measurements (three measurements each), which over the six patients translates to averages taken over 18 measurements each for “redelivery” and “total delivery”

    Article Snippet: Four commercial dosimeters and one in‐house‐designed dosimeter were used for this study: EDR2 radiographic film (Kodak Carestream, Rochester, NY), Wellhofer cc04 ion chamber (CNMC, Nashville, TN), MapCHECK2 2D diode array (Sun Nuclear Corporation), ArcCHECK helical diode array (Sun Nuclear Corporation), and an in‐house‐designed multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom.

    Techniques:

    Venn diagram showing statistically significant grouping of dosimetric systems based on their “total delivery” reproducibility. The coefficient of variation is given in parentheses. The coefficient of variation of film was significantly different from the cc04 ion chamber, MapCHECK with AP beams formed into a composite plane, MapCHECK with AP beams analyzed in a field‐by‐field analysis, and the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The coefficient of variation of the ArcCHECK and the MapCHECK with the original rotational gantry angles were not significantly different from either group.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Reproducibility in patient‐specific IMRT QA

    doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4741

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Venn diagram showing statistically significant grouping of dosimetric systems based on their “total delivery” reproducibility. The coefficient of variation is given in parentheses. The coefficient of variation of film was significantly different from the cc04 ion chamber, MapCHECK with AP beams formed into a composite plane, MapCHECK with AP beams analyzed in a field‐by‐field analysis, and the multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom. The coefficient of variation of the ArcCHECK and the MapCHECK with the original rotational gantry angles were not significantly different from either group.

    Article Snippet: Four commercial dosimeters and one in‐house‐designed dosimeter were used for this study: EDR2 radiographic film (Kodak Carestream, Rochester, NY), Wellhofer cc04 ion chamber (CNMC, Nashville, TN), MapCHECK2 2D diode array (Sun Nuclear Corporation), ArcCHECK helical diode array (Sun Nuclear Corporation), and an in‐house‐designed multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom.

    Techniques:

    Isolating the error caused by setup alone from the redelivery and total coefficients of variation (CV) averaged across all patient plans

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Reproducibility in patient‐specific IMRT QA

    doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4741

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Isolating the error caused by setup alone from the redelivery and total coefficients of variation (CV) averaged across all patient plans

    Article Snippet: Four commercial dosimeters and one in‐house‐designed dosimeter were used for this study: EDR2 radiographic film (Kodak Carestream, Rochester, NY), Wellhofer cc04 ion chamber (CNMC, Nashville, TN), MapCHECK2 2D diode array (Sun Nuclear Corporation), ArcCHECK helical diode array (Sun Nuclear Corporation), and an in‐house‐designed multiple ion chamber (MIC) phantom.

    Techniques: